[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13179580#comment-13179580
 ] 

[email protected] commented on QPID-3690:
-----------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3331/#review4183
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Only minor comments


/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Bridge.h
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3331/#comment9418>

    I'd prefer returning strings by value rather than const ref. Returning a 
ref is a race condition if the string referenced is potentially deleted in a 
different thread. Probably not the case here but I'd prefer to keep a simple 
convention of return by value. The cost of an atomic counter inc/dec is pretty 
small and will be paid anyway if the caller assigns the return value to another 
string.



/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Link.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3331/#comment9419>

    Why no log message here? Bridge connecting seems like a significant event.



/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Link.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3331/#comment9420>

    I agree that this is OK.



/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Link.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3331/#comment9421>

    Where (which class & thread) do we detect failure of a link connection to 
call this? Will it be called multiple times if multiple connections fail?



/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/LinkRegistry.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3331/#comment9423>

    Should be updateAddressLH.


- Alan


On 2011-12-29 03:04:30, Kenneth Giusti wrote:
bq.  
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
bq.  https://reviews.apache.org/r/3331/
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  
bq.  (Updated 2011-12-29 03:04:30)
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Review request for Alan Conway, Gordon Sim, michael goulish, and Ted Ross.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Summary
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  Proposed set of changes that will create a new connection for each bridge 
that is created on a link.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  This addresses bug QPID-3690.
bq.      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3690
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Diffs
bq.  -----
bq.  
bq.    /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Bridge.h 1225178 
bq.    /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Bridge.cpp 1225178 
bq.    /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Link.h 1225178 
bq.    /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Link.cpp 1225178 
bq.    /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/LinkRegistry.h 1225178 
bq.    /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/LinkRegistry.cpp 1225178 
bq.    /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/tests/federation.py 1225178 
bq.    /trunk/qpid/specs/management-schema.xml 1225178 
bq.    /trunk/qpid/tools/src/py/qpid-tool 1225178 
bq.  
bq.  Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3331/diff
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Testing
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  Unit tests.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Thanks,
bq.  
bq.  Kenneth
bq.  
bq.


                
> Allocate a connection per federation bridge (route)
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-3690
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3690
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++ Broker
>    Affects Versions: 0.14
>            Reporter: Ken Giusti
>            Assignee: Ken Giusti
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.15
>
>
> All routes configured between two federated brokers share the same underlying 
> connection.  Since a connection can be serviced by only one thread, all 
> traffic flowing over those routes will be serviced by just one thread.
> If a connection can be allocated for each route instead, then the traffic for 
> each route could be handled by its own thread, allowing better scaling of 
> federation links in a multiprocessor environment.
> Example:  adding two routes to forward from queue1 and queue2 to exchange1 on 
> a peer:
> qpid-route queue add broker1.fizzbin.com broker2.fizzbin.com exchange1 queue1
> qpid-route queue add broker1.fizzbin.com broker2.fizzbin.com exchange1 queue2
> with today's implementation, a single thread would be used to forward the 
> traffic from both queue1 and queue2.  If a connection is allocated to each 
> route, then each queue's traffic could be serviced by its own thread.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to