[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jason Dillaman updated QPID-3777:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: QPID-3777.patch

Proposed patch to clean-up link bindings
                
> Messaging API link binding is not unbound if client disconnects uncleanly
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-3777
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3777
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: C++ Broker, C++ Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.12
>            Reporter: Jason Dillaman
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: QPID-3777.patch
>
>
> Description of problem:
> Link bindings within the Messaging API (e.g. 'test.q;{create:always, 
> node:{type:queue},link:{x-bindings:[{exchange:test.ex,queue:test.q,key:#}]}}')
>  are implemented solely within the client.  Therefore, if the connection 
> between the broker and the client is severed, the client will not be able to 
> remove the link binding as it normally would during a clean client disconnect.
> How reproducible:
> 100%
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Create a link binding via a C++ Messaging API sender or receiver
> 2. Kill the client or sever the link between the client and broker
>   
> Actual results:
> The link binding is still present in the broker
> Expected results:
> The link binding would be unbound when the broker discovers the client was 
> disconnected

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to