[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13212071#comment-13212071
 ] 

Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-3477:
--------------------------------------

Patch was applied, was just a test excludes file.

Looking at it again I think we either close it as 'wont fix', change the test 
to use legal values (its not clear to me its deliberately using an illegal 
one?) and unexclude it, or make the broker react more forcefully by closing the 
connection (which I assume we werent?).
                
> Java Broker does not handle a rejection/acknowledgemnt with invalid code 
> correctly
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-3477
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3477
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java Broker
>    Affects Versions: 0.12
>            Reporter: Andrew MacBean
>            Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 
> QPID-3477-java-broker-not-handling-reject-code-correctly.txt
>
>
> When running the Python client 0-10 tests against the Java broker it was 
> noticed that the following test would cause test run to hang/time out:
> qpid.tests.messaging.endpoints.SessionTests.testReject
> It appears that this is because the Java broker does not handle the following 
> call correctly:
> self.ssn.acknowledge(echos[2], Disposition(REJECTED, code=3, 
> text="test-reject"))

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to