> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Conway [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 10:23 AM
> To: [email protected]; Ted Ross; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1291436 - in /qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp:
> include/qpid/framing/ include/qpid/types/ managementgen/qmfgen/
> managementgen/qmfgen/templates/ src/qmf/ src/qpid/broker/
> src/qpid/ha/
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:21 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:28 -0500, Alan Conway wrote:
> > > ...
> > > That is because there was no code outside of libqpidbroker calling
> > > the generated functions (except for cluster.so but that is never
> > > built on
> > > windows.) The ha plugin now also calls some QMF generated functions.
> > >
> > > Perhaps a better solution is to move the QMF generated code for each
> > > plugin into the plugin library itself, rather than putting it all
> > > into libqpidbroker. If that's preferable I can do that.
> > >
> >
> > I'd say that would be the most preferable idea - any generated code
> > should only be included with the code that actually uses it. This is
> > particular irritation with the current cluster implementation IMO.
>
> So if we move the cluster & ha generated QMF code into their respective
> plugins, do we then want to remove all the EXTERNs in the remaining broker
> QMF code or leave it there for possible future use?

Does the generated code to be in the plugins call the remaining broker QMF 
code?

-Steve

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to