On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Gordon Sim wrote:
On a more minor point, the qpid-cpp release tarball still uses 0.15 as do those for qmf and tools and for the separate java client and broker downloads. The python tarball uses 0.16.
That's down to the various methods used to put version numbers in the dir names. The inconsistency will only be apparent for alphas; I manually fix it up for starting witht the beta.
And while I'm on that topic, we have noted in the past some inconsistencies between components. For example the c++ tarball extracts to qpidc-0.16 [assuming the version number is corrected], the qmf and tools tarballs extract to qpid-qmf-0.16 and qpid-tools-0.16, python extracts to qpid-0.16-alpha (under which we have python and specs), the java client-only download extracts to qpid-client-0.16 and the java broker-only download extracts to qpid-broker-0.16. Is this something that can be addressed simply? i.e. could we tweak the directory names so that they look consistent? (Don't want to embark on the whole svn layout reorg here, just exploring whether a simple naming change for release artefacts is feasible).
I think we could adjust the names, and I'd like to. If we can agree to rationalize things, I can produce another alpha distribution next week with the changes for review.
Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
