I think JCA probably warrants it's own book since there are significant 
differences from just 'general' client programming. 

Regards,

Weston
On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:

> All,
> 
> I think we'd all agree our project documentation is not all it could
> be.  I've started taking a look at at least making a start on tidying
> up some of the docs so that they a) present better and b) are easier
> for us to maintain.  I'm looking at the DocBook content at the moment
> and I'm trying to get a handle on our current documentation set.
> 
> As far as I can tell, we currently publish the following three "books"
> from the DocBook sources
> 
> * AMQP Messaging Broker (Implemented in C++)
> * AMQP Messaging Broker (Implemented in Java)
> * Programming in Apache Qpid: Cross-Platform AMQP Messaging in Java
> JMS, .NET, C++, and Python
> 
> The DocBook files we have also contain information for building a
> monolithic single book which aggregates all these documents, as well
> as including some other files which are not included in the above.
> However, as far as I can tell, we are not publishing this.
> 
> All the content files, used and unused, are housed in a single
> directory with no structure.
> 
> What I would like to do immediately is the following:
> 
> 1) Create a directory structure which reflects the actual organisation
> of the documentation, something like
> 
>   cpp-broker
>   java-broker
>   client-programming
>   common
> 
> and move existing files into the appropriate sub-directory.
> 
> 2) Remove the (seemingly unused) ability to create a monolithic book
> 
> 3) Remove all content which is not referenced within the published books.
> 
> 4) Write a proper makefile which actually works :-)
> 
> Once this has been completed, the remaining content will obviously
> need to be reviewed... and in the medium term I am hoping that we can
> move more and more documentation to be "common" between the brokers.
> However, I think the above is probably a necessary prerequisite.
> 
> Are people happy with this approach? Is there anything in the
> "unpublished" documentation that should be saved?
> 
> -- Rob
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to