Hi Justin, I think it would be good to prepare the final artifacts (some seem like they could just be renamed, but others indicate RC4 in their content) so we can test them before we vote, and signing them would also allow the maven artifacts to be deployed to a staging repo and tested in advance of the vote closing rather than afterwards.
Also, looking at the RC3 thread I notice Darryl raised a request for inclusion relating to updating the ruby gem name which still seems open, is that being deferred to 0.18? Robbie On 10 May 2012 01:57, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. I've now produced 0.16-rc4 at the following location: > > http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc4/ > > It has just one change beyond RC3, r1336378, which disables the HA tests if > required test tools are not in the environment (Thanks, Alan). > > There was one other issue with RC3 that Cajus raised, the Perl client > install on Debian. Darryl looked into it, and it seems to be a Debian > specific problem. With this information, I think it's best we press ahead > with the release. If the fix is minor, we can consider introducing it on > the 0.16 release branch when it becomes available. > > So, I'd like to jump straight to the vote. If you favor releasing the > 0.16-rc4 bits as 0.16, vote +1. If you have a reason to think RC4 is not > ready for release, vote -1. > > Thanks! > Justin > > --- > 0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
