On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > ...unless we dont particularly want people to actually use it*, in which > case it can happily be left out of the docs to avoid clutter and confusion, > but should still be properly maintained in the code itself by having a > naming constant defined along with all the others being used for system > properties (see: ClientProperties). > > (* such as the system property you added recently and have not added to > the page :p)
Indeed ! I purposely avoided adding that to the doc page as it was not really for end users. I believe there are a few like that. (But I should add it as a constant in ClientProperties ... will do that asap). The one I was referring to is "qpid.failover_method_timeout". Again came across this as I was looking at the failover stuff. This seems like something an end user would be interested in. Rajith > > Robbie > > On 9 August 2012 20:03, Rajith Attapattu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Guys, >> >> If you introduce a new system property, please make sure to update the >> following page [1]. >> >> It's important we maintain an accurate list of such properties for our >> uses and to maintain our own sanity :) >> >> Regards, >> >> Rajith >> >> [1] >> http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.16/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/ch03s06.html >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
