There now remains 5 JIRAs open against released versions. Can the following
please have their status updated, either by the assignee or just someone
who actually knows their status:

Ken: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3690

Ted: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3653

Mick: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3398

Kim: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3619

Cliff: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4071


On 12 September 2012 22:55, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks to those who updated their JIRAs. Given there were still around 30
> sitting open against released versions I have just gone through them all
> myself and either updated the fix-for or resolved them based on any
> apparent work done after checking the commit logs (which obviously works
> best when commits reference the JIRA).
>
> There are still a bunch for which the status wasnt clear to me, so can the
> assignees please look at them and update them accordingly:
>
> Ken:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3690
>
> Ted:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3653
>
> Mick:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3398
>
> Kim:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3619
>
> Andrew:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3618
>
> Rajith:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3602
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3612
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3613
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3462
>
> Weston:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3991
>
> Cliff:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4071
>
>
>
> On 2 September 2012 21:10, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> So, 6 months and a couple of releases later, we now have 45 open JIRAs
>> assigned to released versions.
>>
>> Can everyone please take a look at JIRAs they have in 0.15 and 0.17 and
>> either resolve them or update the fix-for to remove them from the old
>> versions?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Robbie
>>
>>
>> On 19 February 2012 23:59, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> As you may or may not have noticed from the hundreds of emails I have
>>> no doubt generated (I kept some of the traffic off the dev list with
>>> bulk changes, but you cant fix some things in bulk without losing
>>> data), I have been on some JIRA cleanup sprees both recently and in
>>> spots over the last several months. This included resolving completed
>>> and/or redundant JIRAs as well as moving obviously incomplete ones to
>>> different fix-for versions, archiving some of our ancient versions,
>>> and removing a few Components that were either duplicates,
>>> obviously-defunct, or the contents of which seemed far better served
>>> by identification though use of Labels.
>>>
>>> One of the things I was aiming to do was clear the released versions
>>> of outstanding JIRAs so they dont show up on the front pages as being
>>> incomplete, as it was a little ridiculous that we still had things
>>> open for released versions going back to 2008. I have now got that
>>> number down to a grand total of 2 which I'm not too sure whether to
>>> resolve or bump forward, so can their respective owners noted below
>>> (or anyone else with a clue) please do so:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3369 (Alan)
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3079 (Ken)
>>>
>>> I am sure there is still a vast amount of cruft in JIRA that we can
>>> tidy up, there are still almost 500 open issues which seems more a bit
>>> much. I dont have anywhere near enough knowledge about many of the
>>> non-Java components to judge whether a lot of issues can be closed or
>>> not (short of them basically saying 'we will never do this' or 'this
>>> is done' and having commits..which, surprisingly, several actually
>>> did), so it would be good id those who do could take a look. This sort
>>> of thing would be *so* much easier to do if we could get things into a
>>> managable state and then keep it there with mere minutes of attention
>>> now and then.  I'm not done looking at the Java stuff, I'm sure there
>>> are still duplicates and invalid things that can be closed and I know
>>> there are still several open JIRAs for the Java client that have work
>>> done on them that it should be possible to close (Rajith, I'm looking
>>> at you sitting with the most assigned open issues in the project :P).
>>>
>>> Robbie
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to