-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7826/#review12997
-----------------------------------------------------------



/proton/trunk/proton-c/CMakeLists.txt
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7826/#comment27976>

    I don't understand the point of most of these lines:
    
    The only ones that I agree with are setting WARNING_FLAGS.
    
    Cmake already sets up different compile flags for the different builds, 
just leave the differences to cmake. If the developer really wants to change 
the flags they can do it themselves. Any flags that are actually necessary for 
the build would be in common between the builds so shouldn't be here anyway.



/proton/trunk/proton-c/CMakeLists.txt
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7826/#comment27977>

    Instead of getting rid of this it should read -
    COMPILE_FLAGS "${WARNINGS_FLAGS} ${OTHER_STUFF}"
    
    where OTHER_STUFF (or a better name) is set to -std=c99 for gcc and the 
flag to compile C as C++ for MSVC.



/proton/trunk/proton-c/CMakeLists.txt
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7826/#comment27978>

    As previous comment



/proton/trunk/proton-c/src/protocol.h.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7826/#comment27979>

    I don't like the way the python changes have been implemented: I think it 
would be much better to have a new separate python script that takes as 
arguments the additional python path and the rest of the command line to run 
and then set up the python path and run the next script.
    
    This would avoid repeating the same, but slightly different, code twice. 
And would be extensible to any new pythons script we have to add. And would 
avoid changing the existing  scripts into something less pythonic (IMO)


- Andrew Stitcher


On Nov. 1, 2012, 2:24 p.m., Kenneth Giusti wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7826/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 1, 2012, 2:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher and Cliff Jansen.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Work In Progress: changes to cmake configuration to support Microsoft Visual 
> C++ Express 2010 IDE.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /proton/trunk/proton-c/CMakeLists.txt 1404604 
>   /proton/trunk/proton-c/README 1404604 
>   /proton/trunk/proton-c/src/codec/encodings.h.py 1404604 
>   /proton/trunk/proton-c/src/protocol.h.py 1404604 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7826/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kenneth Giusti
> 
>

Reply via email to