Wouldn't it be cleaner to implement those functions as macros for the
platforms that don't define it?


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Cliff Jansen <cliffjan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8385/#review14146
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> This looks good from a portability perspective.  But it must present a
> performance penalty on big endian hardware, though I can't quantify the
> amount.  Are these functions not available on some platform?
>
> - Cliff Jansen
>
>
> On Dec. 6, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/8385/
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (Updated Dec. 6, 2012, 11:10 p.m.)
> >
> >
> > Review request for qpid, Cliff Jansen and Rafael Schloming.
> >
> >
> > Description
> > -------
> >
> > Removed the use of [nh]to[hn][ls] in the ANSI only part of the code as
> they are part of BSD sockets API not in ANSI C.
> >
> > There is now some duplication of code which should be removed, but
> nothing serious in my opinion.
> >
> >
> > This addresses bug PROTON-121.
> >     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-121
> >
> >
> > Diffs
> > -----
> >
> >   /proton/trunk/proton-c/src/codec/codec.c 1417656
> >   /proton/trunk/proton-c/src/framing/framing.c 1417656
> >
> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8385/diff/
> >
> >
> > Testing
> > -------
> >
> > Compiled under Fedora and run proton-test against the built code.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andrew Stitcher
> >
> >
>
>


-- 

**

*Hiram Chirino*

*Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*

*hchir...@redhat.com <hchir...@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com*

*skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
*

*blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*

Reply via email to