Hi Robbie,
All great questions. Wholeheartedly agree on
> Going back to where I started, I think the questions and build process
> change required to start doing this on a long term basis warrant a bit of
> discussion and thought, to the extent that I would hold fire on pushing the
> artifact in this release.
Let's table for this release and discuss further for a long term solution.
Thanks for your response, again, great points/questions all around.
Regards,
-W
On Jan 16, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Weston,
>
> I had a think about / quick look at doing this, and cant help but think it
> has now missed the boat.
>
> In terms of putting up the artifact we have in the 'java release' tar, it
> shouldn't be too hard to do on an ad-hoc basis, however doing it properly
> on an ongoing basis it isnt so simple and raised several questions and
> things to consider that would stop me from jumping on publishing it ad-hoc
> for 0.20.
>
> Producing the output as part of the normal build would be a good bit more
> involved and rather contrived compared to what is there now for the clients
> and broker modules, both due to the namaing split (jca vs ra) present in
> the jca module, and the fact its the first and only module producing
> multiple artifacts (inluding non-jar artifacts, i.e the rar, which require
> a very slightly different pom) that happens to have the same name but
> different extension as other artifacts in the module (the jar), and also
> has artifacts that dont have sources jars to go with it (the rar).
>
> Some of the questions I had when thinking about it were:
> - Do we publish the jar as well?
> It seems at least some other projects do, possibly as the sources are only
> for the jar and not the rar.
>
> - Should the rar and the jar really have the same name (excluding the
> extension) if we do?
> It seems at least some projects artifacts dont (e.g the rar is built by a
> maven module for the rar that depends on a module for the jar).
>
> - What would we call it?
> qpid-ra isnt necessarily my first pick for a maven artifact name, but thats
> what it would currently be.
>
> That last question and the earlier mentioned complications in actually
> generating maven artifacts for the jca module lead me on to a related topic
> I have been meaning to bring up for some time. The naming split within the
> jca module is quite annoying, and over complicates things in general but
> far more so in situations such as this. I think it is time we either
> renamed the module to ra (if we think the historic file name is the most
> important thing), or change the output filenames (if we think the source
> tree module name is the most important thing). If we were to change the
> filenames in any way (including giving the rar and jar different names)
> then that would be another reason I would hold off publishing it with the
> current naming.
>
> Going back to where I started, I think the questions and build process
> change required to start doing this on a long term basis warrant a bit of
> discussion and thought, to the extent that I would hold fire on pushing the
> artifact in this release.
>
> Robbie
>
>
> On 15 January 2013 17:09, Weston M. Price <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Robbie,
>> There is a JIRA
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4445
>>
>> Basically requesting that the JCA binaries also be uploaded to the Maven
>> repository. I am more than willing to look at this, but if you have
>> familiarity with the process it might go much faster.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Weston
>> On Jan 15, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The maven binaries for the Java clients and broker are staged at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-133
>>>
>>> Robbie
>>>
>>> On 10 January 2013 12:48, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, everyone. The proposed final 0.20 release candidate, RC4, is
>>>> available here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.20-rc4/
>>>>
>>>> My testing showed everything in good shape, including the proton
>>>> integration.
>>>>
>>>> RC4 has the following changes versus RC3:
>>>>
>>>> r1430909 | kwall | (Wed, 09 Jan 2013) | 5 lines
>>>> QPID-4503: Producer transaction timeout detection feature may produce
>>>> suprious open/idle alerts and close client connections/sessions
>>>> without good cause
>>>>
>>>> r1430904 | kwall | (Wed, 09 Jan 2013) | 5 lines
>>>> QPID-4503: Producer transaction timeout detection feature may produce
>>>> suprious open/idle alerts and close client connections/sessions
>>>> without good cause
>>>>
>>>> r1430554 | astitcher | (Tue, 08 Jan 2013) | 5 lines
>>>> QPID-4095: Move the directory iteration into FileSysDir
>>>>
>>>> r1430452 | jross | (Tue, 08 Jan 2013) | 1 line
>>>> QPID-4368: Add missing dist file
>>>>
>>>> r1430321 | robbie | (Tue, 08 Jan 2013) | 4 lines
>>>> QPID-4521: ensure that the routing key is properly passed to the
>>>> alternate Topic exchange by the adapter. Add unit tests for the
>>>> adapter methods.
>>>>
>>>> r1430320 | robbie | (Tue, 08 Jan 2013) | 4 lines
>>>> QPID-4519: return true for VirtualHost MBean isStatusEnabled, dont
>>>> update stats when doing so, and stop using a synchronized method as a
>>>> result
>>>>
>>>> r1430319 | robbie | (Tue, 08 Jan 2013) | 4 lines
>>>> QPID-4512: stop the delete visitor indicating completion upon the
>>>> first matching queue entry, or any for that matter: it needs to check
>>>> them all.
>>>>
>>>> r1424598 | kgiusti | (Thu, 20 Dec 2012) | 1 line
>>>> NO-JIRA: merge compile fix from trunk
>>>>
>>>> r1423964 | robbie | (Wed, 19 Dec 2012) | 6 lines
>>>> QPID-4511: move the broker-plugins lib dir under build/scratch to
>>>> prevent it being included in the binary produced by 'ant release'.
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts are signed, and if approved by vote, these bits
>>>> precisely would ship as 0.20 GA. I'll follow this with a separate
>>>> [VOTE] mail.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Alex, Keith, Robbie, and Ken for posting your test outcomes on
>>>> the list. It is very much appreciated. Please try RC4 and prepare to
>>>> vote!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> 0.20 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/020-release.html
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
