-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9698/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated March 8, 2013, 7:42 p.m.)


Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher, Alan Conway, Gordon Sim, and Ted Ross.


Changes
-------

Here's an update-in-progress. It is overloaded with the mission code that the 
new locking scheme is designed to protect. Although that code is not part of 
the locking, its integration with CopyOnWriteArray is key to having the locks 
all work correctly.

Since this review was originally published a few simplifying assumptions are in 
play.

1. The desired locking on the exchange is on a per-binding basis. This is 
illustrated by the new mission code rebind():
   bool rebind (boost::shared_ptr<Binding>, 
std::vector<boost::shared_ptr<Queue> >)

The effort is to remove the binding (that has a queue) and replace it with one 
or more identical bindings that each has one of the queues from the vector.

2. It is better to work with CopyOnWriteArray by adding new functions to it to 
effect the rebind() than it is to try locking around repeated calls into 
existing functions.

Keeping the route() functions with no exchange-level locks and using only the 
locks provided by snapshot() keep things flowing quickly.


Description
-------

* Move Topic exchange RWlock up into the parent exchange class and call it 
'bindingLock'.

* In Topic exchange take RWlock out of the derived class and use the parent's 
lock.
* In Direct and Headers exchanges change the semantics of the current lock to 
use the Topic exchange pattern.
* In FanOut exchange add locks at the same places as in the other exchanges 
except only use Rlock. FanOut receives the locking it needs from the 
CopyOnWriteArray and does not need anything else. By adding only Rlocks threads 
will never block in the normal case. However, the Rlocks are the hooks that the 
new application will need to freeze the exchange when that app takes out the 
Wlock.


This addresses bug QPID-4616.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4616


Diffs (updated)
-----

  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/DirectExchange.h 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/DirectExchange.cpp 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Exchange.h 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/FanOutExchange.h 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/FanOutExchange.cpp 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/HeadersExchange.h 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/HeadersExchange.cpp 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Link.cpp 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/TopicExchange.h 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/TopicExchange.cpp 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/ha/BrokerReplicator.h 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/ha/BrokerReplicator.cpp 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/ha/QueueReplicator.h 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/ha/QueueReplicator.cpp 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/CopyOnWriteArray.h 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/xml/XmlExchange.h 1454111 
  trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/xml/XmlExchange.cpp 1454111 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9698/diff/


Testing
-------

Passes normal self tests


Thanks,

Chug Rolke

Reply via email to