On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Rob Godfrey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 4 June 2013 18:54, Rajith Attapattu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I'm strongly against using dependencies for the JMS client unless it's >> > unavoidable. >> > We can make exception for slf4j, but even then my preference is to use >> JDK >> > logging. >> > >> >> If only JDK logging weren't so horrible :-) >> > > Agreed, hence my reason to make an exception for slf4j :D
The ActiveMQ JMS client depends on slf4j and we have not had user complains about it. -- Hiram Chirino Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
