[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13823929#comment-13823929
]
Justin Ross commented on QPID-5338:
-----------------------------------
Yes, I know about that naming convention. I mentioned it to you *before* you
chose qpid*_*messaging for the python binding. At any rate, the guideline does
in the end allow for underscores in the name. We should stick to the pattern
we have.
It's not just a namespace. We could have qpidbananas and qpidclowns if we just
wanted to avoid a collision. Let's save our users having to remember one more
needless difference.
> The Dispatch top-level Python package should be renamed
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-5338
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5338
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Qpid Dispatch
> Reporter: Darryl L. Pierce
> Assignee: Darryl L. Pierce
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> Currently the package name is qpid, which conflicts with the public qpid
> Python package library. A better idea would be to rename it qpiddx.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
