[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13827913#comment-13827913
]
Justin Ross commented on QPID-5365:
-----------------------------------
I think that's a good change to make, but this patch is against the current
state of affairs. AFAICT, there haven't been any changes yet to address
QPID-5335. There's no patch there either. The only associated change seems to
be misattributed.
And the next step: none of the qpid dispatch python code needs to be in
site-packages, at least so far. All of it IMO can go to /usr/lib/qpid-dispatch.
Finally, why /usr/*lib*/qpid-dispatch, out of curiosity? I was thinking
/usr/share/qpid-dispatch made more sense. I'd love any pointers to guidelines
you have.
> Clean up file locations in Dispatch
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-5365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5365
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Qpid Dispatch
> Reporter: Justin Ross
> Assignee: Justin Ross
> Attachments: relocations.patch
>
>
> The attached patch makes the file locations consistent wrt the conventions
> outlined in QPID-5351 and otherwise removes redundancies, simplifies, and
> prepares for future additions.
> With this change, the tests and installs without error in my environment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
