[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13911917#comment-13911917
]
Justin Ross commented on QPID-5550:
-----------------------------------
As to packaging, it still seems to me that it would be simpler, given our
current architecture, to build each binding as a subpackage of the top-level
package that provides the core API implementation.
Anyhow, yes, it would be great to move these into cmake, and to simplify them a
bit on the way.
> Simplify binding artifacts and build metadata
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-5550
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5550
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++ Client, Packaging, Perl Client, Python Client
> Reporter: Justin Ross
> Assignee: Darryl L. Pierce
>
> Right now we build special tarballs for the perl and wrapped python bindings
> of the messaging api in the release.sh script.
> First, what motivates this? Wouldn't be simpler from a packaging standpoint
> to simply build these when you build the C++ parts of the messaging api,
> using just the one cpp source tarball?
> Second, this logic belongs in the cpp subtree, not in the release.sh script.
> We can call into any "make special dist variant" targets we may need from the
> release script.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
