On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 14:33 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 04/11/2014 02:22 PM, Alan Conway wrote: > > Gordon, can you review this trivial fix for 0.28? > > Looks good to me! > > (Did the change that triggered this actually get backported to 0.26 > though? It doesn't look like it from a cursory glance, in which case > there would be no need to backport this) >
You're right, it is not needed on 0.28. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
