----- Original Message -----
> On 05/01/2014 08:55 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Michael Goulish <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >> I tried firing up my messenger-based receivers, each subscribing to 100
> >> addresses, then 200, 300, 400, 500. The results are consistent across
> >> that range, and show that each extra address costs 115 KB. ( Looking
> >> only at resident-set size. )
> >>
> >> So when I tried to do a total of 1,000,000 addrs on one box, I did
> >> indeed overwhelm my memory. That would come to 115 GB, which
> >> would have been more than double my physical mem.
> >>
> >> Please note I did not actually send any messages. A router was running
> >> for these receivers to attach to, but no senders were running.
> >>
> >> Does 115 KB per subscribed addr seem fairly reasonable?
> >>
> >
> > No, that seems quite excessive. Can you trace where the memory is actually
> > coming from?
>
> Just for comparison, a qpid::messaging process with 1000 subscriptions
> over AMQP 1.0 uses 48MB on my laptop. A similar process using AMQP 0-10
> uses 8MB.
>
>
Yikes. A 40 KB per subscription added cost.
That's because 1.0 is ten times as good as 0.10 .
Just off the top of your head -- is there anything inherent
in 1.0 that would make you expect that kind of difference?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
