> On Feb. 21, 2015, 1:08 p.m., Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > The change seems fine from a licence point of view, replacing the 
> > previously added .cmake file rather than figuring out if it is permissable 
> > to include it and updating the LICENCE etc accordingly.
> > 
> > From a CMake and C++ perspective I have no idea really, but accepting that 
> > it looks fine to me :)

I echo Robbie's sentiment.  I'd like to approve it, but we should get someone 
with a cmake eye on it.  Steve, would you add Andrew to the review?


- Justin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31237/#review73404
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 20, 2015, 7:52 p.m., Steve Huston wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31237/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 20, 2015, 7:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Justin Ross and Robbie Gemmell.
> 
> 
> Bugs: QPID-6312
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6312
> 
> 
> Repository: qpid
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I started with simply reimplementing a size_t native check under ASF license 
> and learned that wasn't the whole story for Qpid's needs. It requires a check 
> to see if size_t is distinct from the other int types in qpid/IntegerTypes.h. 
> This patch is the result and, I think, more reliable and fitted to our needs 
> than the previous mechanism.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/qpid/cpp/CMakeModules/CheckSizeTNativeType.cmake 1661190 
>   trunk/qpid/cpp/CMakeModules/CheckSizetDistinct.cmake PRE-CREATION 
>   trunk/qpid/cpp/src/CMakeLists.txt 1661190 
>   trunk/qpid/cpp/src/config.h.cmake 1661190 
>   trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/Options.cpp 1661190 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31237/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> cmake on AIX (where the result is 'yes') and Linux (where the result is 'no').
> If this patch is acceptable, I will request it be merged to 0.32 as well.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Huston
> 
>

Reply via email to