-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31564/#review75331
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Spot onl comments are trivial.


trunk/tests/field_test.c
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31564/#comment122313>

    No need for leading `_` on static function, name can't clash outside the 
file.



trunk/tests/field_test.c
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31564/#comment122314>

    ditto leading `_`


- Alan Conway


On Feb. 27, 2015, 10:45 p.m., Kenneth Giusti wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31564/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 27, 2015, 10:45 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Alan Conway, michael goulish, and Ted Ross.
> 
> 
> Bugs: DISPATCH-101
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-101
> 
> 
> Repository: qpid-dispatch
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Those iterator methods that deal with address-specific operations (e.g. 
> 'views') are renamed to include 'address' in their names.
> 
> Add alias constructors that default the view for non-address fields.
> 
> Explicitly denote those methods that do not change the state of an iterator 
> (const).
> 
> Improve/optimize the cursor advance logic.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/include/qpid/dispatch/iterator.h 1662560 
>   trunk/src/container.c 1662560 
>   trunk/src/iterator.c 1662560 
>   trunk/src/lrp.c 1662560 
>   trunk/src/message.c 1662560 
>   trunk/src/router_config.c 1662560 
>   trunk/src/router_node.c 1662560 
>   trunk/src/router_pynode.c 1662560 
>   trunk/src/waypoint.c 1662560 
>   trunk/tests/field_test.c 1662560 
>   trunk/tests/parse_test.c 1662560 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31564/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added interator cursor advance tests (both string and buffer based).
> 
> Added buffer based address hashing test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kenneth Giusti
> 
>

Reply via email to