A couple of new tests were added in http://svn.apache.org/r1686284. One
of these, testReservedExchangeRedeclaredSameType, verifies that
amq.direct can be redeclared using the correct type with passive set to
false as well as to true.
I believe testing for declare of any standard exchange with
passive=false is incorrect. The spec states:
Exchange names starting with "amq." are reserved for pre-declared
and standardized exchanges. The client MUST NOT attempt to create
an exchange starting with "amq.".
A declare with passive=false is a request to create as far as the client
is concerned. The broker should in my view raise an error in that case
even if the exchange exists, since the client is doing something
forbidden by the spec. Certainly testing that the broker allows it seems
wrong.
If there is no disagreement, I will remove the line from the test. It
will still test that you can passively declare the exchange, as that is
completely legitimate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
