[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14654373#comment-14654373
]
Keith Wall commented on QPID-6678:
----------------------------------
In addition, the the Java Broker does not implement the if-unused flag on the
exchange.delete command.
> Deleting an exchange that is referenced as alternate apparently succeeds but
> marks the exchange as DELETED
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-6678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6678
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker
> Affects Versions: 0.32, qpid-java-6.0
> Reporter: Keith Wall
>
> If I create two exchanges using the Web Management, exch1 and exch2, and make
> *exch2* the alternate exchange of *exch1*, I expect to be prevented from
> deleting exch2 as exch1 refers to it. This does not happen. If I deleted
> *exch1* using Management, the operation apparently succeeds, but the object
> is recorded in the store as having desiredState DELETED. If I then go on to
> restart the Broker, the exchange is removed. If I restart the Broker a
> second time, the VH goes into ERROR state as exch1 refers to a non-existent
> exchange.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
