[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14728013#comment-14728013
 ] 

Andrew Stitcher edited comment on QPID-6717 at 9/2/15 8:53 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

That's true for the non equality (<, <=, >, >=) operators because the spec says 
they only work for numeric types and return false if any argument is non 
numeric.

The equality operators (=, <>) do deal with all types.

{quote}
* Comparison operators: =, >, >=, <, <=, <> (not equal)

** Only like type values can be compared. One exception is that it is valid to 
compare exact numeric values and approximate numeric values; the type 
conversion required is defined by the rules of numeric promotion in the Java 
programming language. If the comparison of non-like type values is attempted, 
the value of the operation is false. If either of the type values evaluates to 
NULL, the value of the expression is unknown.

** String and boolean comparison is restricted to = and <>. Two strings are 
equal if and only if they contain the same sequence of characters.
{quote}

The BETWEEN operator is defined in terms of <= and >= so should use those 
operators:

{quote}
* arithmetic-expr1 [NOT] BETWEEN arithmetic-expr2 AND arithmetic-expr3 
(comparison operator)

** "age BETWEEN 15 AND 19" is equivalent to "age >= 15 AND age <= 19" 
{quote}



was (Author: astitcher):
That's true for the non equality (<, <=, >, >=) operators because the spec says 
they only work for numeric types and return false if any argument is non 
numeric.

The equality operators (=, <>) do deal with all types.

{quote}
- Comparison operators: =, >, >=, <, <=, <> (not equal)

-- Only like type values can be compared. One exception is that it is valid to 
compare exact numeric values and approximate numeric values; the type 
conversion required is defined by the rules of numeric promotion in the Java 
programming language. If the comparison of non-like type values is attempted, 
the value of the operation is false. If either of the type values evaluates to 
NULL, the value of the expression is unknown.

-- String and boolean comparison is restricted to = and <>. Two strings are 
equal if and only if they contain the same sequence of characters.
{quote}

The BETWEEN operator is defined in terms of <= and >= so should use those 
operators:

{quote}
- arithmetic-expr1 [NOT] BETWEEN arithmetic-expr2 AND arithmetic-expr3 
(comparison operator)

-- "age BETWEEN 15 AND 19" is equivalent to "age >= 15 AND age <= 19" 
{quote}


> selector can match incorrectly due to different type for values
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-6717
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6717
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: C++ Broker
>    Affects Versions: qpid-cpp-0.34
>            Reporter: Gordon Sim
>            Assignee: Andrew Stitcher
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: qpid-cpp-next
>
>
> E.g. a selector "x BETWEEN 1 AND 10" would match for a value of x="foo", 
> because of the way the logic is implemented for the between expression, or a 
> selector "x NOT IN ('a', 'b', 'c')" would match where x=1, though it should 
> not due to the type mismatch.
> From JMS spec: "Only like type values can be compared. One exception is that 
> it is valid to compare exact numeric values and approximate numeric values"



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to