-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39596/#review104553
-----------------------------------------------------------


I don't understand the true constraints here.  It seems to be a UI-driven one, 
about what should be listed in the UI and what should not be, so I'd search 
more in the direction of indexed=false or listed=false or hidden=true.

In any case, I think "referential" is the wrong word.  It's (1) obscure and (2) 
doesn't unambiguously indicate the referent in this usage.  I guess 
referent=true would, but again, too weird.  If you go with some variant of 
refer, I'd go referenceable.  A third grader would understand that.

- Justin Ross


On Oct. 27, 2015, 4:31 p.m., Ernie Allen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39596/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 27, 2015, 4:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Alan Conway, Ganesh M, Kenneth Giusti, mick goulish, 
> and Ted Ross.
> 
> 
> Repository: qpid-dispatch
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adds a new attribute to entities named referential. If true then the 
> entity/annotation could be referred to by name. This is to give the console 
> enough information to separate out the sslProfile attributes.
> 
> schema.py can already handle the case where a listener/connector contains a 
> ssl-profile=<sslProfileName> attribute.
> 
> I chose the name 'referential' to indicate that an annotation can be referred 
> to by name. Another possibility is 'referable'.
> 
> I also added an "references" list to an entity in the JSON schema. This list 
> is only emitted if any of the entity's annotations are marked as referential.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   python/qpid_dispatch/management/qdrouter.json c5b1edb 
>   python/qpid_dispatch_internal/management/schema.py 8f7e961 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39596/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> bin/test.sh
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ernie Allen
> 
>

Reply via email to