On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 19:11 +0000, Kim van der Riet wrote: > > > On Dec. 17, 2015, 9:31 p.m., Alan Conway wrote: > > > Go ahead and commit it. I am going to make some changes but I > > > will do the properties and annotations together when I do, > > > meantime this works. Point me at the relevant interop test code > > > and I'll update it when I get there. > > > > > > I note you just have annotations, I'm trying to figure out if we > > > need separate delivery and message annotations. I don't see > > > anything in the spec that allows you to distinguish them by key > > > only so I suspect we might. > > Sorry, I discovered that what I posted was not the most recent... I > changed it so that the keys are always proton::amqp_symbol rather > than value.
I read the spec and I'm going to introduce a new type annotation_key which can be a symbol *or* a long, since that's what the spec actually says :( I'm also going to add delivery instructions, restrict property maps to atomic values (spec again) and put a more native C++ map-like interface on all 3, so you may need to adjust your interop code a bit but it should be pretty straightforward. Cheers, Alan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
