+1 from me On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 17:36 -0500, Ken Giusti wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Andrew Stitcher" <[email protected]> > > To: "proton" <[email protected]>, "Qpid Developers" <dev@qpid. > > apache.org> > > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 5:03:40 PM > > Subject: Dropping proton-dump; Moving to newer minimum CMake > > version > > > > I've been doing some build tree maintenance in Proton and a couple > > of > > issues have come up: > > > > 1. Is anyone using/have a reason to want to keep proton-dump? > > Nope - get rid of it. > > > It's a > > somewhat odd program that seems to have been a debugging tool left > > over > > from the very earliest days of proton. > > > > It uses the internals of the proton-c library so it can't be simply > > linked in with the qpid-proton library without exposing internal > > symbols. > > > > For the present I've just linked it directly with the few c files > > that > > provide the symbols it needs. > > > > 2. I'd like to move the minimum required CMake version to 2.8.7 - > > This > > will allow me to tidy up a certain amount of the build system and > > also > > provide a somewhat more featureful base version of CMake (currently > > we > > support 2.6 onwards) > > > > As far as I can tell: > > > > Ubuntu12.04LTS: CMake 2.8.7 (version on regular TravisCI build) > > RHEL6: CMake 2.8.12 > > Debian Wheezy (7): CMake 2.8.9 > > Fedora 22: CMake 3.4.1 > > > > In general +1. What version does Windows use? > > > Version of CMake on appveyor currently seems to be at least 3.3.2 > > > > So I don't think there should be a probelm for anyone with this > > change. > > > > I'll wait for 3 days and if I don't hear anything from anyone, I'll > > assume that no one wants to keep proton-dump and no one objects to > > upping the minimum supported version of CMake. > > > > Thanks > > > > Andrew > > > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
