[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15324430#comment-15324430
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DISPATCH-367:
-----------------------------------------

GitHub user ganeshmurthy opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/81

    DISPATCH-367 - Swap link pointers so that the distribution will be ba…

    …lanced for synchronous senders

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ganeshmurthy/qpid-dispatch DISPATCH-367

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/81.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #81
    
----
commit e90fc60a4de5e2f4fe67e9ef9275a63aea31c62b
Author: Ganesh Murthy <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-06-10T13:13:12Z

    DISPATCH-367 - Swap link pointers so that the distribution will be balanced 
for synchronous senders

----


> balanced distribution needs to be more... balanced.
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DISPATCH-367
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-367
>             Project: Qpid Dispatch
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Router Node
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.0
>            Reporter: Ken Giusti
>            Assignee: Ganesh Murthy
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>
> When blocking sends are done to a balanced address with multiple consumers on 
> the same router all the messages go to one of the consumers.
> I would expect that the messages would be evenly distributed across all 
> _locally_attached_ consumers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to