[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Keith Wall updated QPID-7658:
-----------------------------
    Component/s: Java Broker

> [Java Broker] Improve LinkRegistry
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-7658
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7658
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Java Broker
>            Reporter: Lorenz Quack
>             Fix For: qpid-java-7.0
>
>
> Currently the AbstractVirtualHost has a Map<remoteContainerId, LinkRegistry>.
> The handling of the remoteContainerId should also be encapsulated in the 
> LinkRegistry giving each VH only a single LinkRegistry.
> Furthermore the following change to the LinkRegistry is proposed:
> * LinkRegistry.putSendingLinkIfAbsent(String localContainerId, String 
> remoteContrainerId, String linkName, Source source, Target target) -> 
> Pair<Source, Target>
> * LinkRegistry.putReceivingLinkIfAbsent(String localContainerId, String 
> remoteContrainerId, String linkName, Source source, Target target) -> 
> Pair<Source, Target>
> * LinkRegistry.getSendvingLink(String localContainerId, String 
> remoteContrainerId, String linkName) -> Pair<Source, Target>
> * LinkRegistry.getReceivingLink(String localContainerId, String 
> remoteContrainerId, String linkName) -> Pair<Source, Target>
> * LinkRegistry.removeSendingLink(String localContainerId, String 
> remoteContrainerId, String linkName) -> Pair<Source, Target>
> * LinkRegistry.removeReceivingLink(String localContainerId, String 
> remoteContrainerId, String linkName) -> Pair<Source, Target>
> The implementation of which must be thread-safe because the LinkRegistry will 
> be accessed on multiple threads concurrently.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to