On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 17:28 +0000, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > On 6 February 2017 at 17:14, Andrew Stitcher <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 17:11 +0000, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > > This should have its own JIRA given PROTON-1344 was already > > > released > > > in 0.16.0 several weeks ago (and this also missed 0.17.0 too) > > > > TBH it's such a small change that I'd have used NO-JIRA except that > > there was an obvious piece of work associated with it. > > > > Andrew > > > > Related JIRA is certainly better than NO-JIRA, though that would > still > preferably be in the same release as the original change, so I'd > likely have called use of that out too in this case. If its a trivial > change its likely a trivial JIRA too. > > Its nice to know whats in a given release, e.g I'm already thinking > of > 0.17.1. Maybe this would be worth being in that...but on the other > hand, if its not important enough to even warrant a JIRA, maybe not.
It's mostly useful for debugging purposes more than anything else (and isn't exactly a bug per se), so I'd probably not bother with 0.17.1. [and now we've written almost 10x the lines of the actual change!] Andrew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
