[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901739#comment-15901739
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-1412:
----------------------------------------
Github user jdanekrh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/95
@astitcher Because there are at least two interchangeable libraries that
can be used (libFuzzer and afl-fuzz). So instead of configuring this in the
build with CMake, I adopted [the convention in
OSS-Fuzz](https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/blob/master/docs/new_project_guide.md#buildsh)
and instead require that the intended library is renamed (or linked with `ln
-s`) to that specific name. I wrote this in the README.md,
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/95/commits/85ff6e7d209aff30a46105b607e6946ef7b41222#diff-44029c0f93a63a627194c3f9fda0da85R64
I do not insist on doing it this way...
> Add fuzzers to proton-c tests
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: PROTON-1412
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1412
> Project: Qpid Proton
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: proton-c
> Reporter: Jiri Danek
> Assignee: Andrew Stitcher
> Priority: Minor
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> Add fuzzers to proton-c test suite in order to be able to perform fuzz
> testing of qpid-proton.
> This would then allow including qpid-proton to
> https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz, a service that executes fuzzers for
> opensource projects.
> I intend to propose a patch to do this today or tomorrow by cleaning up my
> proof-of-concept
> https://github.com/jdanekrh/qpid-proton-fuzz/tree/master/proton-c/src/tests.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
