[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15975007#comment-15975007
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7610:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 1791935 from [~lorenz.quack] in branch 'java/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1791935 ]
QPID-7610: [Java Broker] MemorySystemConfig should override the default
preferenceStoreAttributes.
> [Java Broker] MemorySystemConfig should override the default
> preferenceStoreAttributes
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-7610
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7610
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java Broker
> Reporter: Lorenz Quack
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: qpid-java-broker-7.0.0
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-QPID-7610-Java-Broker-MemorySystemConfig-should-over.patch
>
>
> The MemorySystemConfig should override the preferenceStoreAttributes and
> provide a "Memory" type to make embedding the broker easier.
> from an IRC conversation:
> {code}
> [...]
> <jameshowe> It would make sense if the Memory one overrode it to Memory then
> <jameshowe> no?
> <rgodfrey> yeah - or to NoOp really
> <jameshowe> It's my understanding they're used with the admin UI, so if they
> were Noop then something wouldn't work?
> <lorenz> yes, it looks like we could improve it
> [...]
> <rgodfrey> to the point that jameshowe makes - I agree, noop isn't really
> right… we want a memory type, or to have MemorySystemConfig implement the
> provider interface
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
