[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Rudyy updated QPID-7606:
-----------------------------
Attachment: wip-alternate-binding.tar.gz
> Generalise Queue|Exchange#alternateExchange as alternateBinding
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-7606
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7606
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java Broker
> Reporter: Keith Wall
> Assignee: Keith Wall
> Fix For: qpid-java-broker-7.0.0
>
> Attachments: wip-alternate-binding.tar.gz
>
>
> Queues and exchanges should have something akin to an "alternate binding"
> rather than an alternate exchange. From this we can simplify the DLQ
> implementation to remove the need for DLEs (or at worst have a single DLE).
> Alternate Bindings could be modelled as {{\{destination, arguments\}}}. A
> supported argument might be {{replacementRoutingKey}} which if set could
> direct the routing through the alternate(s) (This is separate - see
> QPID-7771).
> This work includes:
> * changes to the model object themselves and the routing algorithms
> * update the configuration upgrades to remap Exchange#alternativeExchange and
> Queue#alternativeExchange into the new model.
> * the facility for automatic creation of a DLQ should be retained but it can
> be simplified to not create an DLE exchange.
> * On upgrade, existing users' DLQ/DLEs must be retained as is, that is, there
> is no requirement to eliminate existing DLEs. This is because we have no way
> to predict if the users made additional changes to these objects.
> * update UI
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
