Hello Irina, Sounds like a good idea.
Do you plan on providing docker images of all Qpid components? Would be good to have for example the cpp and the java broker available to easily evaluate and compare them. Kind regards, Lorenz On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 10:13 -0400, Irina Boverman wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to propose creating Docker images for Qpid components hosted > in Docker Hub, updated upon component release and maintained by the > project, and I would like to contribute to doing this. > > Availability of Qpid images will make it easier to consume/deploy Qpid > components and promote Qpid visibility. > > We can maintain docker scripts creating these images from the base OS > images and using Qpid installation methods consistent with the OS > distribution. A possible naming convention might be qpid/<component>/<OS>. > I registered the 'qpid' user on DockerHub to use if this seems reasonable. > For example, we could create qpid/dispatch/<OS> image, qpid/<broker>/<OS> > image, qpid/<client(s)>/<OS> image, etc. Initially I would look to support > Fedora/CentOS latest images and Qpid components as RPMs for them, then aim > to expand OS coverage for debian/Ubuntu/etc in the future. > > The goal would be to update Qpid images within a few days upon component > release (either directly or indirectly using yum/dnf from public > repositories). We could ask the Docker team to grant Qpid "official" status > when images have been stabilized. > -- > Regards, Irina. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
