[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16084034#comment-16084034
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on QPIDJMS-298:
----------------------------------------
Github user jdanekrh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-jms/pull/8
@ctron thanks, I haven't noticed that problem.
New version of jacoco plugin has goal `jacoco:report-aggregate`, which
should aggregate coverage across all modules. Using it
* breaks the cyclometric complexity column in the codecov.io report, for
some reason
* causes jacoco to find more partially-covered files in package
`qpid-jms-client/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/jms/selector`, so the coverage
ends up going down, not up, as I had expected.
> Use online service to manage and display coverage reports
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPIDJMS-298
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-298
> Project: Qpid JMS
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: qpid-jms-client, qpid-jms-discovery
> Affects Versions: 0.24.0
> Reporter: Jiri Danek
> Priority: Minor
>
> There are multiple coverage monitoring online services that integrate with
> popular CI services, like TravisCI.
> I propose uploading coverage report from run in TravisCI to some coverage
> monitoring service. This way, test coverage will become more visible.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
