[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16215760#comment-16215760
 ] 

Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-7981:
-----------------------------------

{quote}
I am aware the protocol is symmetric, however the spec states: "If there is no 
pre-existing terminus, and the peer does not wish to create a new one, this is 
indicated by setting the
local terminus (source or target as appropriate) to null." That wording only 
makes sense in the case that the link was initiated by the peer, i.e. where the 
local process is 'responding' to a 'request' from the peer.
{quote}
Correct, the specific case where it makes sense for a peer to send null as the 
*local* terminus is where it is acting in response to an attach it has received.
{quote}
As the spec says: "a peer MUST take responsibility for verifying that the 
remote terminus meets its requirements" and that makes perfect sense to me. The 
distinction between empty and null does not. If I ask for a remote target with 
address Q, whether the peer responds with either null or empty (or even with a 
target with address P as you suggest) doesn't seem important, neither matches 
my 'requirements'.
{quote}
It is correct that a peer MUST always verify - though I'll be honest and wonder 
how many actually do :-).  The fundamental difference that can be inferred from 
receiving null rather than empty or P from your partner is that null indicates 
that they got your attach and could not service it.  Receiving a non null 
terminus implies that either the request was sent spontaneously by your partner 
(unlikely if the relationship is client<->broker), or that the remote container 
considers this the resumption of an existing link where there is already a 
terminus associated.
{quote}
As the spec is defined, it never makes sense for the initiator of a link to set 
the local terminus to null (rather than empty), so the case of simultaneous 
initiation of a link by both peers needs to be detected by actually comparing 
fields of the remote terminus as the peer sees it with local expectations, not 
by relying on it being null. The only way it will be null is if it is indeed a 
response to a request. 
{quote}
Correct.  To guard against simultaneous link attachment (or unexpected link 
resumption) you *always* need to verify the remote terminus.  
{quote}
That is the only 'very specific meaning' of null, as opposed to empty.
{quote}
It is the only meaning *when speaking of the local terminus*.  
When used for the remote source/target it is the difference between "i don't 
remember/I don't care what the remote terminus looks like" (null) and "I 
specifically want the empty terminus" (empty).
{quote}
However, having re-read the spec on these points I can see that my 
'interpretation' was based on what I think is sensible rather than on what the 
spec actually states (though as a minor gripe on formatting, the diagrams use 
the character '-' to indicate both an 'empty' target (figure 2.36) and a 'null' 
target (figure 2.33) which doesn't help to convey the apparently important 
semantic distinction between them).
{quote}
I agree on the gripe with the formatting.  I'll raise an AMQP JIRA for this, 
and the need to include more examples of correct (and incorrect) patterns 
around link attachment.

> [Java Broker] [AMQP1.0] Protocol layer assumes source and target are not null.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-7981
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7981
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java Broker
>            Reporter: Keith Wall
>             Fix For: qpid-java-broker-7.0.0
>
>
> Testing the Broker against Rhea's {{example/helloworld.js}} shows that the 
> AMQP 1.0 protocol layer fails in at least two places.
> The first is if the {{Target}} (not mandatory) is omitted from the incoming 
> attach.
> {noformat}
> 2017-10-21 18:13:20,609 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52033] (o.a.q.s.p.frame) - 
> RECV[/10.211.55.13:52033|0] : 
> Attach{name=7e65e0a0-961f-e941-b42b-262380143f76,handle=0,role=receiver,source=Source{address=examples}}
> 2017-10-21 18:13:20,622 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52033] (o.a.q.s.p.v.LinkImpl) 
> - Error attaching link
> java.lang.NullPointerException: null
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.SendingLinkEndpoint.createConsumerTarget(SendingLinkEndpoint.java:209)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.SendingLinkEndpoint.attachReceived(SendingLinkEndpoint.java:636)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.SendingLinkEndpoint.establishLink(SendingLinkEndpoint.java:352)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AbstractLinkEndpoint.receiveAttach(AbstractLinkEndpoint.java:131)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.LinkImpl.attach(LinkImpl.java:106)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.Session_1_0.receiveAttach(Session_1_0.java:210)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.receiveAttach(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:435)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.type.transport.Attach.invoke(Attach.java:366)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.received(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:517)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.lambda$receive$0(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:469)
>       at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.receive(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:463)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.framing.FrameHandler.parse(FrameHandler.java:211)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.lambda$received$11(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:1316)
>       at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.received(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:1291)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.MultiVersionProtocolEngine.received(MultiVersionProtocolEngine.java:134)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NonBlockingConnection.processAmqpData(NonBlockingConnection.java:606)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NonBlockingConnectionTLSDelegate.processData(NonBlockingConnectionTLSDelegate.java:136)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NonBlockingConnection.doRead(NonBlockingConnection.java:496)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NonBlockingConnection.doWork(NonBlockingConnection.java:270)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NetworkConnectionScheduler.processConnection(NetworkConnectionScheduler.java:134)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.SelectorThread$ConnectionProcessor.processConnection(SelectorThread.java:563)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.SelectorThread$SelectionTask.performSelect(SelectorThread.java:354)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.SelectorThread$SelectionTask.run(SelectorThread.java:97)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.SelectorThread.run(SelectorThread.java:521)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.bytebuffer.QpidByteBuffer.lambda$null$0(QpidByteBuffer.java:1396)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> The second is if the {{Source}}  (again not mandatory) is omitted:
> {noformat}
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,556 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.p.v.f.FrameHandler) - RECV 89 bytes
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,557 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] (o.a.q.s.p.frame) - 
> RECV[/10.211.55.13:52035|0] : 
> Attach{name=c2c65769-7d3b-5440-b8fb-f00badbddd0d,handle=1,role=sender,target=Target{address=examples},initialDeliveryCount=0}
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,562 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] (o.a.q.s.p.frame) - 
> SEND[/10.211.55.13:52035|0] : 
> Attach{name=c2c65769-7d3b-5440-b8fb-f00badbddd0d,handle=1,role=receiver,target=Target{address=examples,durable=none,capabilities=[REJECT_UNROUTABLE,
>  
> DELAYED_DELIVERY]},unsettled={},maxMessageSize=1000000000,offeredCapabilities=[REJECT_UNROUTABLE,
>  DELAYED_DELIVERY],properties={}}
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,565 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] (o.a.q.s.p.frame) - 
> SEND[/10.211.55.13:52035|0] : 
> Flow{nextIncomingId=0,incomingWindow=8192,nextOutgoingId=0,outgoingWindow=2048,handle=1,deliveryCount=0,linkCredit=20000,echo=false}
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,566 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.p.v.f.FrameHandler) - RECV 0 bytes
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,566 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.t.NonBlockingConnection) - Written 430 bytes
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,568 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.t.NonBlockingConnection) - Read 0 byte(s)
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,570 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.t.NonBlockingConnection) - Read 82 byte(s)
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,571 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.p.v.f.FrameHandler) - RECV 53 bytes
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,571 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] (o.a.q.s.p.frame) - 
> RECV[/10.211.55.13:52035|0] : 
> Transfer{handle=1,deliveryId=0,deliveryTag=\x00,messageFormat=0,settled=false}
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,580 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.p.QpidServiceLoader) - Found 3 implementations of interface 
> org.apache.qpid.server.plugin.MessageFormat
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,604 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.m.AbstractConfiguredObject) - authorise returned DEFER
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,604 DEBUG [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.m.AbstractConfiguredObject) - authorise returned DEFER, returing 
> default: ALLOWED
> 2017-10-21 18:19:52,608 WARN  [IO-/10.211.55.13:52035] 
> (o.a.q.s.p.v.f.FrameHandler) - Unexpected exception handling frame
> java.lang.NullPointerException: null
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.StandardReceivingLinkEndpoint.receiveDelivery(StandardReceivingLinkEndpoint.java:262)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AbstractReceivingLinkEndpoint.receiveTransfer(AbstractReceivingLinkEndpoint.java:163)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.Session_1_0.receiveTransfer(Session_1_0.java:572)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.receiveTransfer(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:794)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.type.transport.Transfer.invoke(Transfer.java:295)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.received(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:517)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.lambda$receive$0(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:469)
>       at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.receive(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:463)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.framing.FrameHandler.parse(FrameHandler.java:211)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.lambda$received$11(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:1316)
>       at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.received(AMQPConnection_1_0Impl.java:1291)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.MultiVersionProtocolEngine.received(MultiVersionProtocolEngine.java:134)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NonBlockingConnection.processAmqpData(NonBlockingConnection.java:606)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NonBlockingConnectionTLSDelegate.processData(NonBlockingConnectionTLSDelegate.java:136)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NonBlockingConnection.doRead(NonBlockingConnection.java:496)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NonBlockingConnection.doWork(NonBlockingConnection.java:270)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.NetworkConnectionScheduler.processConnection(NetworkConnectionScheduler.java:134)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.SelectorThread$ConnectionProcessor.processConnection(SelectorThread.java:563)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.SelectorThread$SelectionTask.performSelect(SelectorThread.java:354)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.SelectorThread$SelectionTask.run(SelectorThread.java:97)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.transport.SelectorThread.run(SelectorThread.java:521)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>       at 
> org.apache.qpid.server.bytebuffer.QpidByteBuffer.lambda$null$0(QpidByteBuffer.java:1396)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> Default source and target to empty objects appears to resolve the problem.
> The protocol tests should be strengthen to cover these cases/



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to