[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16520743#comment-16520743
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DISPATCH-1045:
------------------------------------------

Github user codecov-io commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328
  
    # 
[Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328?src=pr&el=h1) 
Report
    > Merging 
[#328](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328?src=pr&el=desc) into 
[master](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/commit/2e766f35cf2b3a172aaa58cef6c996376e69f1c9?src=pr&el=desc)
 will **increase** coverage by `0.1%`.
    > The diff coverage is `92.85%`.
    
    [![Impacted file tree 
graph](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328/graphs/tree.svg?src=pr&token=rk2Cgd27pP&width=650&height=150)](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328?src=pr&el=tree)
    
    ```diff
    @@            Coverage Diff            @@
    ##           master     #328     +/-   ##
    =========================================
    + Coverage   86.52%   86.63%   +0.1%     
    =========================================
      Files          69       69             
      Lines       15479    15494     +15     
    =========================================
    + Hits        13393    13423     +30     
    + Misses       2086     2071     -15
    ```
    
    
    | [Impacted 
Files](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328?src=pr&el=tree) | 
Coverage Δ | |
    |---|---|---|
    | 
[src/router\_node.c](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328/diff?src=pr&el=tree#diff-c3JjL3JvdXRlcl9ub2RlLmM=)
 | `94.49% <100%> (+0.06%)` | :arrow_up: |
    | 
[src/router\_core/transfer.c](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328/diff?src=pr&el=tree#diff-c3JjL3JvdXRlcl9jb3JlL3RyYW5zZmVyLmM=)
 | `89.96% <80%> (-0.05%)` | :arrow_down: |
    | 
[src/router\_core/router\_core.c](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328/diff?src=pr&el=tree#diff-c3JjL3JvdXRlcl9jb3JlL3JvdXRlcl9jb3JlLmM=)
 | `99.25% <0%> (+0.37%)` | :arrow_up: |
    | 
[src/router\_core/agent\_link.c](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328/diff?src=pr&el=tree#diff-c3JjL3JvdXRlcl9jb3JlL2FnZW50X2xpbmsuYw==)
 | `63.79% <0%> (+0.57%)` | :arrow_up: |
    | 
[src/message.c](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328/diff?src=pr&el=tree#diff-c3JjL21lc3NhZ2UuYw==)
 | `87.34% <0%> (+1.48%)` | :arrow_up: |
    
    ------
    
    [Continue to review full report at 
Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328?src=pr&el=continue).
    > **Legend** - [Click here to learn 
more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta)
    > `Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data`
    > Powered by 
[Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328?src=pr&el=footer).
 Last update 
[2e766f3...e40858d](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/328?src=pr&el=lastupdated).
 Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments).



> Sometimes close connetion after releasing partial multi-frame messsage
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DISPATCH-1045
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1045
>             Project: Qpid Dispatch
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Router Node
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Alan Conway
>            Assignee: Ganesh Murthy
>            Priority: Major
>
> Since DISPATCH-1012 the router releases undeliverable deliveries.
> In the case of a multi-frame delivery, it is possible for dispatch to release 
> it before the entire delivery has been received. Presently dispatch settles 
> such deliveries and advances its link. That means that if another transfer 
> for the same delivery arrives, dispatch regards it as a new message with an 
> invalid delivery-id and closes the connection. Since the release is 
> asynchronous, there's no way for the client to avoid this possibility.
> Worth checking the spec but I suspect we should be dropping the extra data 
> rather than closing the connection. Need to investigate how this would work 
> in proton - I think we'd update the delivery without settling it and then 
> wait for the remote to settle before finally throwing it away.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to