[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16543700#comment-16543700
 ] 

Rob Godfrey commented on QPIDJMS-402:
-------------------------------------

[~gemmellr] so I've now tried two more Mac laptops.  On my 2017 15" MacBook Pro 
I saw 0.34 being faster than 0.33 (though nowhere near as dramatically as the 
improvement I saw on Fedora).  On my 2013 13" MacBook Pro I see numbers much 
closer to those from my 2018 12" MacBook (non-Pro) which I shared earlier.  
Unlike the first laptop, the 2013 13" has active cooling and so is not 
thermally throttled in "normal" operation, yet I get 11500msg/s on 0.33 and 
8800msg/s on 0.34 ... so I think the best we can say is that results on OS X 
are hardware dependant (all the laptops are running OS X 10.13).

> Massive performance degradation in 0.34.0
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPIDJMS-402
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-402
>             Project: Qpid JMS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: qpid-jms-client
>    Affects Versions: 0.34.0
>         Environment: Windows 7x64 + Oracle JDK 8u161x64
> Windows 7x64 + Open JDK 8u171x64
> CloudFoundry (Ubuntu Trusty) + Open JDK 8u172x64
>            Reporter: Johan Stenberg
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: QpidJms402_PerfTest.java, 
> image-2018-07-13-16-39-19-707.png, qpidjms402.zip
>
>
> This is a followup issue for 
> [http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/qpid-jms-Severe-performance-issue-after-upgrading-from-0-33-0-to-0-34-0-td7678052.html]
> I am attaching a simple test case that shows the issue. When I use qpid jms 
> 0.33 I get 2000msg/s send + receive on my local machine. When I switch to 
> 0.34 the message rate drops to 20msg/s.
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to