[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16571860#comment-16571860
]
Alan Conway commented on PROTON-1910:
-------------------------------------
> I looked into re-using a message with electron. I had gotten some
> suggestions from the "web" ;). but I wasn't able to figure it out.
You can for Sender but not for Receiver (sigh). I guess I need to look into
automatic caching/re-use after all.
{code:java}
m := NewMessage()
m.SetBlahBlah(blahblah);
m.Marshal("one")
s.SendSync(m)
m.Clear()
m.Marshal("two")
s.SendSync(m)
{code}
> Profiling indicates that cgo becomes a bottleneck during scale testing of
> electron
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PROTON-1910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1910
> Project: Qpid Proton
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: go-binding
> Affects Versions: proton-c-0.24.0
> Reporter: Aaron Smith
> Assignee: Alan Conway
> Priority: Major
>
> While performing scale testing, detailed profiling of Go test clients showed
> that >95% of the execution time can be devoted to the cgo call. The issues
> seems to be related on sends to the NewMessage() call. For receives, the
> bottleneck is both NewMessage() and the call to actually receive the message.
>
>
> This behavior is not unexpected as CGO is a well-known bottleneck. Would it
> be possible to have a NewMessage() call that return multiple messages and a
> recv call that took an "At most" argument. i.e. recv(10) would receive 10 or
> fewer messages that might be waiting in the queue. Also, it would be nice to
> be able to trade latency for throughput in that the callback wasn't triggered
> until N messages were recieved (with timeout)....
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
