[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17176426#comment-17176426
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-2237:
----------------------------------------
kpvdr commented on a change in pull request #256:
URL: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/256#discussion_r469349354
##########
File path: python/proton/_message.py
##########
@@ -90,13 +90,16 @@ def _check(self, err):
def _check_property_keys(self):
for k in self.properties.keys():
- if isinstance(k, unicode):
- # py2 unicode, py3 str (via hack definition)
+ # Check for string type. (py2: unicode, py3: str via type hack
above)
+ # String subclasses symbol and char are excluded
+ # (But so are other string subclasses that would be encoded as
type string!)
+ if type(k) == unicode:
Review comment:
After discussion, we think that AMQP subclasses of string should be
excluded from the conversion. Thus, symbol and char will cause an exception,
but other user-defined subclasses will be converted.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> [python] Non-string message property keys not handled correctly
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PROTON-2237
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2237
> Project: Qpid Proton
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: python-binding
> Reporter: Kim van der Riet
> Priority: Major
>
> The AMQP 1.0 spec allows only string keys for message properties.
> Proton's Python binding has a method (_message.py:91 _check_property_keys())
> for checking message property keys, but it does not handle all cases
> correctly:
> # Proton types Symbol and Char are derived from string, and are allowed in
> the test. This results in an illegal encoding.
> # Because in Python 2, many coders carelessly use string literals without
> the required u'' prefix (and thus results in a bytes type), bytes types are
> converted to unicode string types. However, the encode() function is being
> used, which simply returns a binary type in Python 2 and raises an error in
> Python 3. This should probably be the decode() method, which returns a string
> and works for both Python 2 and 3.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]