[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-2178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17370575#comment-17370575
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DISPATCH-2178:
------------------------------------------
kgiusti commented on a change in pull request #1267:
URL: https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/1267#discussion_r659760829
##########
File path: src/dispatch.c
##########
@@ -122,9 +122,9 @@ STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(long) >= sizeof(void*),
pointer_is_bigger_than_long);
qd_error_t qd_dispatch_load_config(qd_dispatch_t *qd, const char *config_path)
{
- qd->dl_handle = dlopen(QPID_DISPATCH_LIB, RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_NOLOAD);
+ qd->dl_handle = dlopen(NULL, RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_NOLOAD);
Review comment:
This dlopen is done for backward compatibility, right? Can you drop a
comment here explaining that?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Do not build separate libqpid-dispatch.so
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: DISPATCH-2178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-2178
> Project: Qpid Dispatch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.16.0
> Reporter: Jiri Daněk
> Assignee: Jiri Daněk
> Priority: Major
>
> h3. Motivation
> The split into a binary and a library is not unprecedented (e.g. CPython does
> exactly the same thing), but in Dispatch it is avoidable with minimal code
> changes (an executable can {{dlopen(NULL, ...)}} itself.
> Getting rid of libqpid-dispatch.so will mean one less file that we need to
> install (and since it is not a published API, finding a good place for the so
> has been tricky in the past (see DISPATCH-194).
> Furthermore, avoiding the indirection of a library call will likely give some
> performance benefit at a low level (individual function calls) similar to
> (again) Python in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonStaticSpeedup.
> The gains can be best utilized after doing LTO (see DISPATCH-2121).
> h3. Expected issues
> The problem with this is that we lose semantic interposition
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonNoSemanticInterpositionSpeedup),
> meaning we won't be able to simply override symbols from libqpid-dispatch.so
> at runtime. This is an issue because Dispatch unittests depend on this. (See
> DISPATCH-1783)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
