[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17376590#comment-17376590
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on QPID-8534:
--------------------------------------

mklaca commented on pull request #97:
URL: https://github.com/apache/qpid-broker-j/pull/97#issuecomment-875630250


   Hi @alex-rufous,
   
   your statement is not correct:
   > The #doWork() can only be invoked multiple times if there are free IO 
threads to process other connections
   
   Let assume situation when there is 2 threads in the thread pool, a single 
selector and a single connection. The selector task occupies one thread A and 
the second thread B is kept busy by the connection.
   Based on your statement the connection working loop is interrupted because 
there is not any free thread. The connection is re-scheduled and picked up by 
the same thread B for processing again.
   
   The thread B is in loop:
   1. The thread picks up the connection from the working queue.
   2. The thread invokes #doWork().
   3. The thread interrupts the loop of #doWork() because there is not any free 
thread.
   4. The connection is returned to the queue.
   
   The thread B drops and picks up the single connection and this useless 
iteration repeats again and again.
   
   The correct condition should be:
   > The #doWork() can only be invoked multiple times if there is not any  
another connections/job to process
   
   The suggested change keeps the "fairness functionality":
   If the working queue is empty then all connections are being processed by 
some thread and there is not any abandoned connection. Hence, no need to 
interrupt #doWork() loop.
   If the working queue is not empty then there is a waiting connection. The 
#doWork() loop is interrupted after the first call of the #doWork() method and 
the thread picks up the waiting connection from the queue. If there is any 
waiting message then it's processing will not be blocked.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> [Broker-J] Improper interruption of connection processing loop
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-8534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8534
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker-J
>            Reporter: Marek Laca
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: Broker, Connection, Java
>
> The network connection scheduler (NetworkConnectionScheduler class) contains 
> a thread pool. IO-threads are polling jobs from the scheduler work queue and 
> executing them. The connection job works in the loop. The loop is interrupted 
> when there is not any data to process or all IO-threads are occupied.
> If the loop is interrupted then the IO-thread pushes the connection job back 
> into the queue and picks the next job from the queue. It should ensure that 
> any job is not abandoned and it is not waiting in the queue for ever.
>  But when the number of jobs equals to the thread pool size then IO-thread 
> stops processing the connection job, pushes it back into the queue and polls 
> the same job again, again and again.
> The connection job could check whether is there any job in the scheduler 
> queue. If the queue was not empty then the connection working loop would be 
> interrupted and the thread could pick up another job. It would simplified the 
> broker code significantly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to