Github user dlaboss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quarks/pull/98#discussion_r61129034
--- Diff:
samples/scenarios/src/main/java/quarks/samples/scenarios/iotf/range/sensor/IotfRangeSensor.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+package quarks.samples.scenarios.iotf.range.sensor;
+
+import static quarks.analytics.math3.stat.Statistic.MAX;
+import static quarks.analytics.math3.stat.Statistic.MEAN;
+import static quarks.analytics.math3.stat.Statistic.MIN;
+import static quarks.analytics.math3.stat.Statistic.STDDEV;
+
+import java.io.File;
+import java.util.Date;
+import java.util.Random;
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
+
+import com.google.gson.JsonElement;
+import com.google.gson.JsonObject;
+import com.pi4j.io.gpio.Pin;
+import com.pi4j.io.gpio.RaspiPin;
+
+import quarks.analytics.math3.json.JsonAnalytics;
+import quarks.connectors.iot.IotDevice;
+import quarks.connectors.iot.QoS;
+import quarks.connectors.iotf.IotfDevice;
+import quarks.function.Supplier;
+import quarks.providers.direct.DirectProvider;
+import quarks.providers.direct.DirectTopology;
+import quarks.topology.TStream;
+import quarks.topology.TWindow;
+
+public class IotfRangeSensor {
--- End diff --
This is a new file so can the indenting be made consistent within it wrt
use of spaces vs tabs? Things aren't lining up. Note, as recently noted in
DEVELOPMENT.md, the desire is no hard tabs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
