[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QUARKS-180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15289937#comment-15289937
 ] 

Daniel John Debrunner commented on QUARKS-180:
----------------------------------------------

Fair point on the JobMXBean, but someone has to remove it at some point 
otherwise it's a memory leak

But I wasn't clear enough on the state issue. After the job is closed 
job.getState() continues to return RUNNING.



> Calling stateChange(CLOSE) on JobMXBean does not change its state fully.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QUARKS-180
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QUARKS-180
>             Project: Quarks
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime
>            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>
> Trying to close a Job through its JobMXBean I'm not sure the process is being 
> completed. JobMXBean .stateChange just calls job.stateChange..
> I can trace it calling Executable.close() but I can't see any code that then 
> changes the state of the job and removes its JobMXBean.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to