On Jun 9, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Eric Tanter <etan...@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
>> Yes, Carl got my point right. And yes, that's like showing square brackets 
>> in the stepper ;)
> Right now, the two cases are slightly asymmetric, since there's a
> syntax property indicating the use of [] or {}, but none indicating
> the use of ', #', #`, etc.  Similarly there's no syntax property
> indicating the difference between (a b) and (a . (b)) (something I
> once tried to fix, but gave up on).

Wait... what!?

I had no idea. Well, that's *great* news!

Next question: is there a way to push this through pretty-print?  I looked for 
a mechanism in the docs, but didn't find one.

Perhaps the stepper should just forget about using pretty-print. Is the 
editor's indentation machinery exposed in a way that could be used by the 


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

  For list-related administrative tasks:

Reply via email to