I submitted a request to the computer language shootout to rename PLT to Racket. The following message shows the difference in performance between 4.2.5 and 5.0 - it's probably worth taking a look at the discrepancies.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <shootout-featurereque...@alioth.debian.org> Date: Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:19 PM Subject: [shootout-Feature Requests][312552] Scheme PLT should be renamed to Racket To: nore...@alioth.debian.org Feature Requests item #312552, was changed at 2010-06-07 12:06 by Isaac Gouy You can respond by visiting: https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411005&aid=312552&group_id=30402 >Status: Closed Priority: 3 Submitted By: Sam TH (samth-guest) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Scheme PLT should be renamed to Racket Category: Update Programming Language Group: None >Resolution: Fixed Initial Comment: PLT Scheme has been renamed to Racket, and has released a new version, 5.0. See http://racket-lang.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Isaac Gouy (igouy-guest) Date: 2010-06-17 20:18 Message: Check for unlikely measurements (mandelbrot #2 on u32?) http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/measurements.php?lang=racket http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/measurements.php?lang=racket Check against mzscheme (which will be removed in a week or so) http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=racket&lang2=mzscheme http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=racket&lang2=mzscheme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411005&aid=312552&group_id=30402 -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
