These most recent examples with "let:", "let*:", and "letrec:" highlight
that users of P4P still need to know about Racket semantic distinctions
that other languages don't provide the programmer. (Instead, they might
have a more familiar "var" or "def", for example.)
So I bet that Racket code in P4P is still looking obtuse to many of the
same people who refuse to try sexp syntax.
(I'm not discouraging this P4P line of inquiry, and I'm curious to see
where it goes.)
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
