Several things to reply to, but before I get to them, it's critical that I fix this misconception:
> 2. I doubt that we can figure out the usefulness of this new syntax > on this mailing list. I am not trying to. I only posted it here because I figured having lots of eyes look at it would likely yield some interesting feedback. And that has indeed been the case. I don't think a mailing list is going to resolve this one way OR the other (so for the same reason, I am also ignoring the dismissive tone of some of the postings here). Shriram _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev