On Aug 6, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > BTW, IIRC, there is a way to load a new copy of a library, but that > could be pretty bad. Alternatively, there's probably a way to unload > a library, so perhaps this could be hacked -- somehow voiding all > references to code from it. But I'm not sure if there's a sane way to > do that so other things don't break. (Where breaking could also be > reloading a library over and over.)
Sounds reasonable. May I add this text to the docs for ffi-lib? : Note! On UNIX-based platforms, loaded libraries are associated with Racket or DrRacket for the duration of the process; re-evaluating ffi-lib will not force a re-load of the corresponding library. John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
