On Aug 17, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:

> We're attempting to write down coding guidelines for the project.
> Here is a first attempt:
> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay/tmp/201008161509-guidelines.html
> Please comment.

You write 

"As long as your code fulfills its promises and meets each of these criteria, 
you can push incrementally.

For example, I may be working on adding an exhaustive queue library to Racket. 
I imagine supporting 30 different functions across 5 different queue 
implementations. I don't have to wait to push until all 150 function 
implementations are documented, tested, and stressed. I can push whenever I 
make progress on each of the required points."

Either this is contradictory, or I'm misunderstanding it.  The first paragraph 
suggests that the code must meet each of the criteria; the second suggests that 
as long as it's *closer* to meeting the required criteria, it's fine.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

  For list-related administrative tasks:

Reply via email to